I often make references here to “digital
utopians,” the folks of the ‘90s who kept telling us the internet would set our
minds and news media free from the constraints and censorship imposed by
corporate ownership. We could all be
our own newspaper, TV and radio outlets. Always implicit, and sometimes
embarrassingly explicit, in the online utopian screeds of that decade was the
hope or assumption that nastiness like racism and sexism were ideological
impositions on workers and that, once free of corporate media, we’d be free of
that, too. Nice sentiment.
I still hear folks defending this position that
racism and sexism will “wither away” once we own our own, online, media: they
remind me that corporate control of the media really hasn’t disappeared, it has
just evolved so as to acquire a significant hold over digital media, along with
broadcast outlets, newspapers and the rest of the traditional media, and that
all we have to do is push back online and we can bring about the digital
millennium. It turns out they’re wrong. The (not so) new media is as bad a
place to be as the old. Perhaps worse, in that the bad things that used to
happen slowly, in print and at a distance, can now take place instantly and in
our homes, on our phones.
For a few years now I’ve been babbling here
about the need for unions to make more and better use of the new media. I’ve
often pointed to the labour movement’s internal barriers to that. But, to my
shame, I’ve not spent any time at all looking at some of the many ways in which
the new media can be used as a platform for targetting groups in a way that old
media never could.
I’ll touch on other targeted groups in future
columns, but, in a belated salute to International Women’s Day, let’s take a
peek at what women face. It ain’t pretty. In fact it’s so ugly I had trouble
finding examples fit to print without censoring them to the point of
uselessness. To illustrate the problem, check the CBC News post, “Sexist tweets
aimed at female politicians captured on blog (http://tinyurl.com/aaxzezl). At
lot more productive, and less prone to offend to the point where you just want
to avert your eyes, are conversations about the problem taking place here and
there between women online, a great example being the Facebook group
“Feministas of Canada.” Check out, as well, Huffington Post blogger Soraya
Chemaly’s recent commentary, “Online Threats Against Women Aren't Trivial and
Don’t Happen in a Vacuum.”
“Sexist commentary – the jokes, the asides, the
slights, the tweets – is hostile,” she writes, “but it’s just the very surface
of what we’re dealing with. This isn’t about being ‘offended,’ it’s about
feeling marginalized as a result of hate and disdain.” More than a few
explicitly feminist online publications have been tackling the silencing of women.
Jezebel’s editor Jessica Coen did in
“When There’s So Much Bullshit Online, You Forget How to Feel”
(http://tinyurl.com/bvltk5p).
Amanda Marcote responded in Slate, in “Online Misogyny: Can’t Ignore it, Can’t Not Ignore It” (http://tinyurl.com/754t8yo).
Amanda Marcote responded in Slate, in “Online Misogyny: Can’t Ignore it, Can’t Not Ignore It” (http://tinyurl.com/754t8yo).
And just in case you doubted that online
misogyny transcends borders and class, read the piece by Jane Fae in The New
Statesmen, called “Misogyny, intimidation, silencing – the realities of online
bullying.” It’s about the hostile online reaction women politicians face in the
UK when expressing an opinion about pretty much anything, including the
weather.
What’s most distressing is the inescapable
conclusion a few minutes reading leaves you with: whether it comes in the form
of a threat of physical violence (sometimes accompanied by a reference that
implies the sender knows where you live or work); or “joke” polls about which
celebrities deserve to die; or supposedly moderated groups and discussion
forums that ignore complaints about abusive comments, the internet is not a
safe or comfortable place for women trying to organize.
And I do mean “organize” in the broadest sense.
Want to attract some nasty boys? Watch what happens when a woman trys to use
Facebook or Twitter to get women friends together for a pub night or a bus
trip. Fake something completely innocuous, with no explicit political content.
Just make it clear it’s a women-only event, and watch the abuse fly your way.
I appealed on Facebook for anecdotes about the
nasty side of online organizing, and one of the women who responded did exactly
that, and the most striking thing about the nasty boy’s reaction was the
absolute casualness of it. As astounding as what she described was, it wasn’t
directed at me and so I can only imagine what it’s like to be on the receiving
end.
Usually I end a rant like this with a
prescription for a solution. I don’t know what to say, except: Do in cyberspace
what has worked out here in meatspace. Find or build safe spaces and work
outwards from there. I’d end by saying how depressed my little investigation
made me, but there are a bunch of sisters working through and around this shit,
so really it’s more a matter for constructive anger than depression.
WEBHEAD BITS AND BYTES
Trying to wean your union off Microsoft/Apple
corporate software? Here’s a useful checklist on getting there from The New
Internationalist, called “10 Steps to Software Freedom”
(http://tinyurl.com/c9dwqo3).
If you’re the webhead for your small
website-less local union and see the advantages of having a union domain for
your activist’s e-mail addresses, go here for some simple instructions for
setting it up: http://tinyurl.com/yhu9lad.
Not yet signed-on to Alex White’s e-mail list?
Here’s another reason to do so. See “Five Essential Elements of Startegy for
Unions to Win,” at: http://tinyurl.com/bug644g.
ASK WHAT PEOPLE WANT
When LabourStart’s Twitter feeds first got up
and running, we were posting one item per hour 24 hours a day to the global
feed, and one per hour, 12 hours a day, to the Canadian English and French
feeds. (Note to newbie readers: I’m LabourStart’s senior Canadian
correspondent.) A couple of weeks in we surveyed our followers for all those
accounts. The results were interesting in that the global feed’s followers were
clear: cut it back to eight per day, evenly spaced. The Canadians, however,
were equally clear: stay at one per hour.
Surveys like this are worth doing for all your
social media accounts. After complaining and seeing no change, I’ve unliked a
couple of Canadian union pages on Facebook just because their updates were
flooding my newsfeed, making it hard to find anything not from them. Did they
really think I wanted something from them every 20 minutes? Worse, most of what
they were throwing at me didn’t originate with them but instead was something
they were just passing along, often from
a source I had already “liked” or followed.
Speaking of asking people what they want,
building global solidarity at the rank-and-file level is why LabourStart tries
to organize a conference somewhere in the world each year. To test the waters
for another conference in Canada, we ran a short survey to gauge interest. So,
it looks like we’ll be in the Vancouver area in 2014. But, most interesting
were the responses to a couple of throw-away questions that were added. Almost
80 per cent of respondents either didn’t know if their union was engaged in
international work, or knew it wasn’t. And these were Canadian trade unionists
with enough of an interest in international solidarity actions to be on our
mailing list. If anyone would know,
you’d think they would, but they often didn’t.
When was the last time your union used an
online survey, or even a smartphone app, to systematically survey its members
about what they think of their union and what it does, and what they know and
don’t know about it – and then educate and maybe organize them in the process? I suspect not in a long while, if ever.
Online, such things can be done a lot more frequently than was possible when we
needed to rely on polling firms to do the work.
Union Solidarity International (British union
Unite’s international arm) has made available a nice piece of video on the uses
to which Brazilian unions are putting social media. See
http://tinyurl.com/coz7wo2. Watch, listen and envy. Then emulate.
No comments:
Post a Comment